Título: The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique: A Learner-centered Multiple-choice Response Form
Autores: DiBattista, David; Brock University
Fecha: 2005-12-31
Publicador: Canadian Journal of Higher Education
Fuente:

Tipo: research-article
Tema: No aplica
Descripción: ABSTRACT The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IFAT) is a new multiple-choice response form that has advantages over more commonly used response techniques. The IFAT, which is commercially available at reasonable cost and can be used conveniently with large classes, has an answer-until-correct format that provides students with immediate, corrective, item-by-item feedback. Advantages of this learner-centered response form are that it: (a) actively promotes learning; (b) allows students’ partial knowledge to be rewarded with partial credit; (c) is strongly preferred by students over other response techniques; and (d) lets instructors more easily maintain the security of multiple choice (MC) items so that they can be reused from one semester to the next. The IFAT’s major shortcoming is that grading must be done manually because it does not yet have a compatible optical scanning device. Helpful suggestions are presented for instructors who may be considering using the IFAT for the first time. RÉSUMÉ La Technique D’Évaluation Immédiat (Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique ou IFAT) est un nouveau formulaire pour examens à choix multiple qui a plusieurs avantages. Le IFAT, disponible à un prix raisonable et convenable pour les cours suivis par de nombreux étudiants, est constitué d’un format dans lequel les édudiants selectionnent alternative-par- alternative parmi les choix disponibles jusqu’à ce que la réponse correcte soit indiquée. En suite, la correction est automatique et informe la réponse correcte immédiatement. Le IFAT a plusieurs avantages: (a) il favorise l’apprentissage; (b) les étudiants peuvent obtenir des points partiels avec connaissances partiels; (c) les étudiants préferent ce formulaire à comparer à autres formats à choix multiple; et (d) les instructeurs peuvent maintenir plus facilement leurs questions et alternatives en sécurité et les réutiliser au cours des prochaines sessions. Le défaut principal du IFAT est que la notation est manuele car il n’y a pas encore de lecteur optique compatible avec ce formulaire. Des suggestions utiles sont ici données pour les instructeurs qui envisagent d’utiliser cette technique pour la première fois.
Idioma: Inglés

Artículos similares:

University Supports for Open Access: A Canadian National Survey por Greyson, Devon; University of British Columbia,Vézina, Kumiko,Morrison, Heather,Taylor, Donald,Black, Charlyn
The SciELO Open Access: A Gold Way from the South por Packer, Abel L.; Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization
Librarians and Libraries Supporting Open Access Publishing por Richard, Jennifer; Acadia University,Koufogiannakis, Denise; University of Alberta Libraries,Ryan, Pam; University of Alberta Libraries
A Matter of Discipline: Open Access, the Humanities, and Art History por Tomlin, Patrick; Virginia Tech University
Development of Disruptive Open Access Journals por Anderson, Terry; Athabasca University,McConkey, Brigette; Athabasca University
Review of Maurice Bowra: A Life por Leal, David L.; The University of Texas at Austin
International Development and Research Capacities: Increasing Access to African Scholarly Publishing por Metcalfe, Amy Scott; University of British Columbia,Esseh, Samuel; Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana and University of British Columbia,Willinsky, John; Stanford University and University of British Columbia
10 
The Determinants of University Participation in Canada (1977–2003) por Christofides, Louis N.; Universities of Cyprus and Guelph,Hoy, Michael; University of Guelph,Yang, Ling; University of Guelph