| Título: | Argument Evaluation Contest Results |
| Autores: | Adler, Jonathan E. |
| Fecha: | 1991-01-01 |
| Publicador: | Informal logic |
| Fuente: |
 |
| Tipo: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion research-article |
| Tema: | No aplica |
| Descripción: | In Vol. XI, No.1, this journal announced an argument analysis contest. Two eminent colleagues agreed to serve as judges-Professor Henry W. Johnstone, Jr. and Professor Michael Scriven. In short order, four entries were received and sent off to the judges, who had no knowledge of the contestants' identities, and in due course the judges' verdicts were delivered. Immediately below we have reproduced the argument which was to be analyzed, along with the rules of the contest, followed by the four entries. Thereafter we present the judges' rulings. |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
1 Why Critical Thinking Should Be Combined With Written Composition por Hatcher, Donald L. | 6 There is no Fallacy of Arguing from Authority por Coleman, Edwin |
2 Teaching Argument Construction por Kingsbury, Justine | 7 Book Abstracts por , |
3 Logic, Art and Argument por Groarke, Leo | 8 Are "Gap-Fillers" Missing Premisses? por Grennan, Wayne |
4 From the Editors por , | 9 Kvanvig`s The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind por Driver, Julia |
5 | 10 Book Abstracts por , |