| Título: | Learning (About) Outcomes: How the Focus on Assessment Can Help Overall Course Design |
| Autores: | Ascough, Richard S.; Queen's University at Kingston |
| Fecha: | 2011-08-12 |
| Publicador: | Canadian Journal of Higher Education |
| Fuente: |
 |
| Tipo: | research-article |
| Tema: | No aplica |
| Descripción: | The demand for quantitative assessment by external agencies and internal administrators can leave post-secondary instructors confused about the nature and purpose of “learning outcomes” and fearful that the demand is simply part of the increasing corporatization of the university system. This need not be the case. Writing learning outcomes has a number of benefits for course design that go beyond program assessment. This article clarifies some key aspects of the push towards using “learning outcomes,” and introduces a tripartite nomenclature for distinguishing between course “outcomes,” “outputs,” and “objectives.” It then outlines a process for instructors to use these three categories to develop and design courses that meet institutional assessment demands while also improving overall teaching effectiveness. L’évaluation quantitative que demandent les agences externes et les administrateurs internes peut confondre les instructeurs de niveau postsecondaires quant à la nature et à l’objectif des « résultats d’apprentissage », et leur faire craindre que cette demande ne fasse simplement partie de la privatisation croissante du système universitaire. Ce n’est pas forcément le cas. La création de résultats d’apprentissage présente de nombreux avantages sur le plan de la conception de cours, avantages qui vont au-delà de l’évaluation de programme. L’article clarifie quelques aspects principaux de la poussée vers l’utilisation de « résultats d’apprentissage » et présente une nomenclature tripartite pour faire la distinction entre les résultats de cours, le rendement et les objectifs. Il décrit ensuite un processus pour que les instructeurs emploient ces trois catégories afin de concevoir des cours qui répondent aux exigences en évaluation de l’institution, tout en améliorant l’efficacité de l’enseignement dans son ensemble. |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
1 University Supports for Open Access: A Canadian National Survey por Greyson, Devon; University of British Columbia,Vézina, Kumiko,Morrison, Heather,Taylor, Donald,Black, Charlyn | 6 The SciELO Open Access: A Gold Way from the South por Packer, Abel L.; Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization |
2 Librarians and Libraries Supporting Open Access Publishing por Richard, Jennifer; Acadia University,Koufogiannakis, Denise; University of Alberta Libraries,Ryan, Pam; University of Alberta Libraries | 7 Review of Unfinished Agendas: New and Continuing Gender Challenges in Higher Education por Shanahan, Theresa; York University |
3 A Matter of Discipline: Open Access, the Humanities, and Art History por Tomlin, Patrick; Virginia Tech University | 8 Review of Organizing Higher Education for Collaboration: A Guide for Campus Leaders por Johnston, Mark; Univer- sity of British Columbia |
4 Development of Disruptive Open Access Journals por Anderson, Terry; Athabasca University,McConkey, Brigette; Athabasca University | 9 Review of Maurice Bowra: A Life por Leal, David L.; The University of Texas at Austin |
5 International Development and Research Capacities: Increasing Access to African Scholarly Publishing por Metcalfe, Amy Scott; University of British Columbia,Esseh, Samuel; Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana and University of British Columbia,Willinsky, John; Stanford University and University of British Columbia | 10 The Determinants of University Participation in Canada (1977–2003) por Christofides, Louis N.; Universities of Cyprus and Guelph,Hoy, Michael; University of Guelph,Yang, Ling; University of Guelph |