| Título: | Editorial Policy |
| Autores: | -, -; Research and Publication Office - Liceo de Cagayan University |
| Fecha: | 2013-01-17 |
| Publicador: | Advancing Radiologic Technology Research |
| Fuente: |
 |
| Tipo: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| Tema: | No aplica |
| Descripción: | Pursuant to the character of this publication, the journal is indexed by the following agencies: (1) Philippine Electronic Journals; (2) Google Scholar; and, (3) Public Knowledge Project. The Advancing Radiologic Technology Research is open to the global community of scholars who wish to have their researches published in a peer-reviewed journal. Contributors can access the website: www.ejournals.ph, and www.asianscientificjournals.com. Articles are contributed by researchers of the field of radiology. The frequency of issue is once a year. The efficiency and effectiveness of the editorial review process are critically dependent upon the actions of both the research authors and the reviewers. An author accepts the responsibility of preparing the research paper for evaluation by independent reviewers. The responsibility includes subjecting the manuscript to evaluation by peers and revising it prior to submission. The review process is not to be used as a means of obtaining feedback at early stages of developing the research paper. Reviewers and editors are responsible for providing constructive and prompt evaluation of submitted research papers based on the significance of their contribution and on the rigors of analysis and presentation. THE PEER REVIEW SYSTEM Definition. Peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field who are qualified and able to perform impartial review. Peer review refers to the work done during the screening of submitted manuscripts and funding applications. This normative process encourages authors to meet the accepted standards of their discipline and prevents the dissemination of unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations and personal views. Peer review increases the probability that weaknesses will be identified, and, with advice and encouragement, fixed. For both grant-funding and publication in a scholarly journal, it is also normally a requirement that the subject is both novel and substantial. Type. The double-blind review process is adopted for the journal. The reviewer/s and the author/s do not know each other’s identity. Recruiting Referees. The task of picking reviewers is the responsibility of the editorial board. When a manuscript arrives, an editor solicits reviews from scholars or other experts to referee the manuscript. In some cases, the authors may suggest the referees’ names subject to the Editorial Board’s approval. The referees must have an excellent track record as researchers in the field as evidenced by researches published in refereed journals, research-related awards, and an experience in peer review. Referees are not selected from among the author’s close colleagues, students, or friends. Referees are to inform the editor of any conflict of interests that may arise. The Editorial Board often invites research author to name people whom they considered qualified to referee their work. The author’s input in selecting referees is solicited because academic writing typically is very specialized. The identities of the referees selected by the Editorial Board are kept unknown to research authors. However, the reviewer’s identity can be disclosed under some special circumstances. Peer Review Process. The Editorial Board sends advance copies of an author’s work to experts in the field (known as “referees” or“reviewers”) through e-mail or a Web-based manuscript processing system. There are two or three referees for a given article. Two are experts of the topic of research and one is an expert in research and statistics who shall review the technical components of the research. These referees return to the board the evaluation of the work that indicates the observed weaknesses or problems along with suggestions for improvement. The board then evaluates the referees’ comments and notes opinion of the manuscript before passing the decision with the referees’ comments back to the author(s). Criteria for Acceptance and Rejection. A manuscript is accepted when it is (1) endorsed for publication by 2 or 3 referees, (2) the instructions of the reviewers are substantially complied; (3) ethical standards and protocols are complied for studies involving humans and animals; and (4) the manuscript passed the plagiarism detection test with a score of at least 80 for originality, otherwise the manuscript is rejected. The referees’ evaluations include an explicit recommendation of what to do with the manuscript, chosen from options provided by the journal. Most recommendations are along the following lines:• Unconditional acceptance • Acceptance with revision based on the referee’ recommendations • Rejection with invitation to resubmit upon major revisions based on the referees’ and editorial board’s recommendations • Outright rejection In situations where the referees disagree substantially about the quality of a work, there are a number of strategies for reaching a decision. When the editor receives very positive and very negative reviews for the same manuscript, the board will solicit one or more additional reviews as a tie-breaker. In the case of ties, the board may invite authors to reply to a referee’s criticisms and permit a compelling rebuttal to break the tie. If the editor does not feel confident to weigh the persuasiveness of a rebuttal, the board may solicit a response from the referee who made the original criticism. In rare instances, the board will convey communications back and forth between an author and a referee, in effect allowing them to debate on a point. Even in such a case, however, the board does not allow referees to confer with each other and the goal of the process is explicitly not to reach a consensus or to convince anyone to change his/ her opinions. |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
1 Radiographic Analysis between Real Human and Human Phantom Using Conventional X-ray Machine in Liceo de Cagayan University School Year 2009-2010 por Orong, Denise O; 0000-0002-2518-7866
Liceo de Cagayan University,Cabasag, Carl Benedict; 0000-0001-9677-2512
Liceo de Cagayan University,Bongaros, Amaliah; 0000-0003-0213-5067
Liceo de Cagayan University,Bastillada, Julius; 0000-0002-0082-8516
Liceo de Cagayan University,Boo, Feyd; 0000-0003-4819-0838
Liceo de Cagayan University | 6 Level of Community Awareness on Selected Medical Imaging Modalities on the Availability of Health Care Services in Canitoan Village por Almajar, James A; 0000-0001-8126-8858
Liceo de Cagayan University,Carbon, Niña Marie C; 0000-0001-6370-2059
Liceo de Cagayan University,Cepeda, Brent Lloyd R; 0000-0002-4745-0813
Liceo de Cagayan University,Ebcas, Eamme Fides U; 0000-0002-3829-5292
Liceo de Cagayan University,Flores, Khristy Joy L; 0000-0001-9651-7837
Liceo de Cagayan University |
2 Trauma Patients’ Satisfaction on Radiographers Management Based on Standard Operational Procedures in X-Ray Facilities Cagayan De Oro City por Dy, Estelita Gozo; 0000-0002-4996-5124
Liceo de Cagayan University,Mardan, Faizal T; 0000-0002-8587-2443
Liceo de Cagayan University,Mama, Annajobaira M; 0000-0001-7858-5748
Liceo de Cagayan University,Pabualan, Claire Nathalie C; 0000-0002-8447-8911
Liceo de Cagayan University,Prantilla, Ian Kris I; 0000-0002-3994-9112
Liceo de Cagayan University | 7 Learning Styles and Academic Performance among Radiologic Technology Students of Liceo de Cagayan University por Orong, Denise O; 0000-0002-2518-7866
Liceo de Cagayan University,Amandoron, Raquel Lea M; 0000-0001-6838-9452
Liceo de Cagayan University,Ambat, Charlie L; 0000-0001-8726-9405
Liceo de Cagayan University,Arcadio, Mark Leonard R; 0000-0003-4892-1282
Liceo de Cagayan University,Argayoso, Jed Alison J; 0000-0003-4245-0758
Liceo de Cagayan University |
3 Supervisory Practices of Radiologic Technology Clinical Instructors and the Clinical Performance of Radiologic Technology Interns of Liceo de Cagayan University por Marcos, Kizzy T; 0000-0001-9281-7453
Liceo de Cagayan University,Cruz, Fenella A; 0000-0001-5401-6831
Liceo de Cagayan University,Durotan, Angelie T; 0000-0002-4297-4829
Liceo de Cagayan University,Sumalpong, Luigi Mikhail N; 0000-0002-1668-5492
Liceo de Cagayan University,Tajor, Kristine Ingrid Mae H; 0000-0003-4807-0078
Liceo de Cagayan University | 8 Preliminary Determination of the Microbial Count on X-Ray Tables in Selected Hospitals in Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines por Espina, Edzen A; 0000-0001-5686-1860
Liceo de Cagayan University,Baguio, Robbie Ringo G; 0000-0001-8677-6042
Liceo de Cagayan University,Balcovero, Marvs Tadeo D; 0000-0002-4002-2816
Liceo de Cagayan University,Barrieta, John Lester S; 0000-0002-8939-3300
Liceo de Cagayan University,Banasihan, Dan Engelan Q; 0000-0002-3465-3742
Liceo de Cagayan University |
4 Written Revalida Examination as Predictor in Passing the Radiologic Technology Licensure Examination among the Radiologic Technology Graduates of Liceo de Cagayan University por Almajar, James A; 0000-0001-8126-8858
Liceo de Cagayan University,Gabule, Jessa May S; 0000-0003-3338-4090
Liceo de Cagayan University,Quilantang, Romil M; 0000-0002-9569-955X
Liceo de Cagayan University,Semine, Nino Jan G; 0000-0002-1628-8489
Liceo de Cagayan University,Velasco, Oliver Y; 0000-0003-4597-3546
Liceo de Cagayan University | 9 The Relationship Between Teaching Strategies and Academic Performance of Radiologic Technology Students por Orong, Denise O; 0000-0002-2518-7866
Liceo de Cagayan University,Alcantara, Zyrah Mae; 0000-0001-7201-3706
Liceo de Cagayan University,Asok, Jr., Gauvain; 0000-0002-6543-3099
Liceo de Cagayan University,Baguasan, Mark P; 0000-0003-2508-3239
Liceo de Cagayan University,Bretaña, Ivy G; 0000-0002-6123-4607
Liceo de Cagayan University,Evangelio, Jan Roy D; 0000-0001-9886-3610
Liceo de Cagayan University,Galimba, Earl Joseph M; 0000-0001-8891-498X
Liceo de Cagayan University |
5 The Level of Discomfort Experienced Among Patients Who Undergone Mammographic Examination por Almajar, James A; 0000-0001-8126-8858
Liceo de Cagayan University,Abugho, Jesyl D; 0000-0002-5489-4076
Liceo de Cagayan University,Ebcas, Erich Jan E; 0000-0002-5655-5641
Liceo de Cagayan University,Rosell, Diana Cristy B; 0000-0002-1425-5544
Liceo de Cagayan University,Sabaña, Kareen June P; 0000-0002-7286-3900
Liceo de Cagayan University,Sabellina, Charisse Mae L; 0000-0003-3939-4759
Liceo de Cagayan University | 10 Editorial Board por -, -; Research and Publication Office - Liceo de Cagayan University |