Título: Have Business Method Patents Gotten a Bum Rap? Some Empirical Evidence
Autores: Hunter, Starling David, III
Fecha: 2003-08-15
2003-08-15
2003-08-15
Publicador: MIT
Fuente:
Tipo: Working Paper
Tema: Patents
Business Method Patents
Intellectual Property
Data Processing
Electronic Commerce
Descripción: This study presents the results of an empirical test of two hypotheses concerning the quality of a group of data processing patents on methods of doing business. The hypotheses are motivated by two frequently voiced criticisms of these patents: that their scope is overly broad and that they cite too little "prior art" (the extant body of knowledge or the array of prior solutions to the problem which the patented invention purports to solve). Using a sample of over 3,500 data processing, software, and internet patents granted between 1975-1999, I tested the two hypotheses with three patent statistics - the number of patent and non-patent prior art citations and the number of claims. In short, I find little support for the "conventional wisdom" concerning patents on methods of doing business. More specifically, I find that these patents neither cite less patent or non-patent prior nor make more claims While these findings don't completely exonerate business method patents of the charges of inferior quality, they do suggest that, at a minimum, they are no worse than other data processing patents along these two aspects of patent quality
Idioma: Inglés

Artículos similares:

Description Of Procedures In Automotive Engine Plants por Artzner, Denis,Whitney, Dr. Daniel
Reading Courtesy Amounts on Handwritten Paper Checks por Palacios, Rafael,Wang, Patrick S.P.,Gupta, Amar
On Trees and Logs por Pavlova, Anna,Cass, David
Saturn, The GM/UAW Partnership por Rubinstein, Saul,Kochan, Thomas
Academic Earmarks and the Returns to Lobbying por De Figueiredo, John M.,Silverman, Brian S.
10