Título: Embedded Implicatures and Experimental Constraints: A Reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla
Autores: Sauerland, Uli; University of Wuppertal and Center for General Linguistics (ZAS)
Fecha: 2010-01-25
Publicador: Semantics and pragmatics
Fuente:
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Peer-reviewed Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Tema: conversational implicature, embedded implicature, experimental pragmatics, free-choice permission, truth dominance
Descripción: Experimental evidence on embedded implicatures by Chemla (2009b) and Geurts & Pouscoulous (2009a) has fewer theoretical consequences than assumed: On the one hand, the evidence successfully argues against obligatory local implicature computation, which has however already been discredited. On the other hand, the data are fully consistent with optional local implicature computation. doi:10.3765/sp.3.2 BibTeX info
Idioma: Inglés

Artículos similares:

Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding por Barker, Chris; NYU,Shan, Chung-chieh; Rutgers
Bishop Sentences and Donkey Cataphora: A Response to Barker and Shan por Elbourne, Paul David; Queen Mary, University of London
Semantics and Pragmatics -- A New Journal por Beaver, David; University of Texas at Austin,von Fintel, Kai; MIT
Instructions for S&P authors using LATEX 2ε por von Fintel, Kai; MIT,Potts, Christopher; University of Massachusetts at Amherst,Shan, Chung-chieh; Rutgers University
Local Contexts por Schlenker, Philippe; Institut jean Nicod, CNRS and New York University
Free choice for all: a response to Emmanuel Chemla por Geurts, Bart; University of Nijmegen,Pouscoulous, Nausicaa; University College London
Quantifiers in Than-Clauses por Beck, Sigrid; Universitaet Tuebingen
Embedded implicatures?!? por Geurts, Bart; University of Nijmegen,Pouscoulous, Nausicaa; University College London
10 
Two kinds of modified numerals por Nouwen, Rick; Utrecht University