L
Título: Gene flow among different teosinte taxa and into the domesticated maize gene pool
Autores: Warburton, M.L.
Wilkes, G.
Taba, S.
Charcosset, A.
Mir, C.
Dumas, F.
Madur, D.
Dreisigacker, S.
Bedoya, C.
Prasanna, B.M.
Xie, C.X.
Hearne, S.
Franco, J.
Fecha: 2013-06-07
2013-06-07
2011
Publicador:
Fuente: Ver documento
Tipo: Journal article
Tema: Crop evolution
Gene flow
Maize (Zea mays ssp. mays)
Molecular Markers
Teosinte
Descripción: Maize (Zea mays L. ssp. mays) was domesticated from one wild species ancestor, the Balsas teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) about 9000 years ago. Higher levels of gene diversity are found in teosinte taxa compared to maize, following domestication and selection bottlenecks. Diversity in maize can be increased via gene flow from teosinte, which has certainly occurred from various taxa, but the rate of flow from different teosinte taxa and the final impact on maize evolution has been difficult to measure. One hundred populations from six Zea taxa, both domesticated (maize) and wild (teosinte), including domesticated landraces from Asia, Africa, and the Americas, were genotyped with 17 SSR markers using 15 individuals per population. Overall levels of diversity were high, and populations could be distinguished based on markers. Relationships between populations followed most published reports, or can now help resolve previously conflicting reports. Gene flow into maize from different teosinte groups, and gene flow between different teosintes, was estimated. Evidence for contributions from the Balsas teosintes and from Chalco teosintes (Z. mays ssp. mexicana) to the maize gene pool was found, as well as from Chalco into ssp. mexicana race "Durango" and Z. mays ssp. huehuetenengensis. These contributions are almost certainly the result of post-domestication (and ongoing) exchanges. This information must give more impetus to in situ conservation of teosinte species, and use of these teosintes to continue to direct the evolution of maize, especially in response to new diseases, insect pests, and other biotic and abiotic stresses.
Idioma: English
Artículos similares:
Soil fertility management research for the maize cropping systems of smallholders in Southern Africa: A review por Kumwenda, J.D.T.,Waddington, S.R.,Snapp, S.S.,Jones, R.B.,Blackie, M.J.
El potencial de la labranza de conservacion en la Mixteca Oaxaqueña por Bravo Espinosa, M.,Nieuwkoop, M. van,Contreras, J.R.,Jimenez, J.L.,Morales Guerra, M.
La adopcion de las tecnologias de labranza de conservacion en La Fraylesca, Chiapas por Nieuwkoop, M. van,Lopez Baez, W.,Zamarripa Moran, A.,De la Piedra Constantino, R.,Cruz Chavez, F.J.,Camas Gomez, R.,Lopez Martinez, J.
10 
Increasing wheat yields sustainability through agronomic means por Hobbs, P.R.,Sayre, K.D.,Ortiz-Monasterio, I.