L
Título: Medical students as human subjects in educational research
Autores: Sarpel, Umut; Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Hopkins, Mary Ann
More, Frederick
Yavner, Steven
Pusic, Martin
Nick, Michael W.
Song, Hyuksoon
Ellaway, Rachel
Kalet, Adina L.
Fecha: 2013-01-14
Publicador: Co-Action Publishing
Fuente: Ver documento
Tipo:
Tema: Institutional review board; Educational research; Computer assisted instruction; Learning; Medical Students
Descripción: Introduction: Special concerns often arise when medical students are themselves the subjects of education research. A recently completed large, multi-center randomized controlled trial of computer-assisted learning modules for surgical clerks provided the opportunity to explore the perceived level of risk of studies where medical students serve as human subjects by reporting on: 1) the response of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at seven institutions to the same study protocol; and 2) the thoughts and feelings of students across study sites about being research subjects. Methods: From July 2009 to August 2010, all third-year medical students at seven collaborating institutions were eligible to participate. Patterns of IRB review of the same protocol were compared. Participation burden was calculated in terms of the time spent interacting with the modules. Focus groups were conducted with medical students at each site. Transcripts were coded by three independent reviewers and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Results: The IRBs at the seven participating institutions granted full (n=1), expedited (n=4), or exempt (n=2) review of the WISE Trial protocol. 995 (73% of those eligible) consented to participate, and 207 (20%) of these students completed all outcome measures. The average time to complete the computer modules and associated measures was 175 min. Common themes in focus groups with participant students included the desire to contribute to medical education research, the absence of coercion to consent, and the low-risk nature of the research. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that risk assessment and the extent of review utilized for medical education research vary among IRBs. Despite variability in the perception of risk implied by differing IRB requirements, students themselves felt education research was low risk and did not consider themselves to be vulnerable. The vast majority of eligible medical students were willing to participate as research subjects. Participants acknowledged the time demands of their participation and were readily able to withdraw when those burdens became unsustainable.Keywords: institutional review board; educational research; computer-assisted instruction; learning; medical students(Published: 25 February 2013)Citation: Med Educ Online 2013, 18: 19524 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.19524
Idioma: Inglés
Artículos similares:
Keeping learning central: a model for implementing emerging technologies por Willcockson, Irmgard U.; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston,Phelps, Cynthia L.; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
The implementation of a mobile problem specific electronic CEX for assessing directly observed student-patient encounters por Ferenchick, Gary S.; Michigan State University,Foreback, Jami; McLaren Regional Medical Center,Towfiq, Basim; Hurley Medical Center,Kavanaugh, Kevin; Kalamazoo Center for Medical Studies,Solomon, David; Michigan State University,Mohmand, Asad; Michigan State University
Computer Education in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs por Barbosa, Joilo C., Willoughby, Paula, Mrtek, Robert G., Rosenberg, Craig A.
10