L
Título: Responses by breast and prostate cancer patients to out-of-pocket costs in Newfoundland and Labrador
Autores: Housser, E.; Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information
Mathews, M.; Memorial University
LeMessurier, J.; Memorial University
Young, S.; Memorial University
Hawboldt, J.; Memorial University
West, R.; Memorial University
Fecha: 2013-06-05
Publicador: Multimed Inc.
Fuente: Ver documento
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Tema: Out-of-pocket costs; financial barriers; patient responses
Descripción: PurposeCancer patients face substantial care-related outof- pocket (oop) costs that may influence treatment decisions, attitudes, and use of drug- or appointmentrelated cost-saving strategies. We examined the relationship between oop costs and care-related responses by patients.MethodsWe surveyed 170 prostate and 131 breast cancer patients presenting at clinics or support groups, or listed on the cancer registry in Newfoundland and Labrador.ResultsIn the 3-month period before the survey, 18.8% of prostate and 25.2% of breast cancer patients had oop costs greater than $500. Those oop costs consumed more than 7.5% of quarterly household income for 15.9% of prostate and 19.1% of breast cancer patients. Few patients (8.8% prostate, 15.3% breast) ever adopted any drug- or appointment-related cost-saving strategy. Few patients (7.2% prostate, 9.6% breast) said oop costs influenced treatment decisions, told their  physicians about their oop costs (27.0% prostate, 21.1% breast), or were aware of available financial assistance programs (27.3% prostate, 36.9% breast). Compared with patients having low or moderate oop costs (22.9% prostate, 16.7% breast, and 25.7% prostate, 58.3% breast respectively), a larger proportion of prostate (56.0%) and breast (58.3%) cancer patients with high oop costs said that those costs created stress. Among prostate cancer patients, a larger proportion of those having high oop costs (compared with low or moderate costs) used drug-related (22.2% vs. 3.3% and 9.6% respectively) and appointment-related (11.1% vs. 1.1% and 3.8% respectively) cost-saving strategies, said oop costs created an unusual amount of stress (48.0% vs. 18.4% and 10.4%), and had difficulty paying those costs (29.2% vs. 6.2% and 10.4%).ConclusionsFor a small group of breast and prostate cancer patients, oop costs are high, but rarely lead to the use of care-related cost-saving strategies or influence care decisions.
Idioma: Inglés
Artículos similares:
Massage Therapy for Cancer Patients: A Reciprocal Relationship Between Body and Mind por Sagar, Stephen,Dryden, Trish; Centre for Applied Research, Centennial College,Wong, Raimond K; McMaster University, Departments of Medicine and Oncology
Cord stem-cell transplantation in Ontario: do we need a public bank? por Gassas, A.; the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
Integrating Science and Human Values for Cancer Patient Care por Sutcliffe, Simon B.; BC Cancer Agency
Assessment and management of febrile neutropenia in emergency departments within a regional health authority—a benchmark analysis por Szwajcer, D.; University of Manitoba,Czaykowski, P.; University of Manitoba,Turner, D.; CancerCare Manitoba
Conservative Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer por Souhami, Luis; McGill University,Rene, Nicholas,Cury, Fabio Biagini
Liver transplantation for symptomatic liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumours por Chan, G.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Université de Montréal,Kocha, W.,Reid, R.,Taqi, A.,Wall, W.,Quan, D.
10 
What is the optimal management of dysphagia in metastatic esophageal cancer? por Cavallin, F.; Veneto Institute of Oncology,Scarpa, M.; Veneto Institute of Oncology,Cagol, M.; Veneto Institute of Oncology,Alfieri, R.; Veneto Institute of Oncology,Castoro, C.; Veneto Institute of Oncology