Título: “Labor’s Monkey Wrench”: Newsweekly Coverage of the 1962-63 New York Newspaper Strike
Autores: Tracy, James F; Florida Atlantic University
Fecha: 2006-10-23
Publicador: Canadian Journal of Comumunication
Fuente:
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
research-article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Tema: Communication; Media Studies; Media History
Media/mass media; labour; strikes; collective bargaining; newspapers--United States; newsweeklies--United States; International Typographical Union; frame analysis.
Descripción: Abstract: This article provides a frame and textual analysis of coverage appearing in Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report of the 114-day 1962-63 strike of the International Typographical Union Local 6 against New York City newspapers. The strike was particularly important for asserting the union’s collective bargaining rights and establishing its stance on automated printing processes. Analysis of the newsweeklies’ treatment of the strike suggests how these outlets related the event in terms favourable to the newspaper publishers, while misrepresenting or disparaging the union’s position in and justification for the strike. Résumé : Cet article propose une analyse textuelle de la couverture médiatique de Time, Newsweek et U.S. News & World Report de la grève qui opposait l’International Typographical Union Local 6 aux quotidiens new-yorkais, conflit qui a duré 114 jours en 1962-63. La grève a été particulièrement importante dans l’affirmation des droits syndicaux à la négociation collective et dans le positionnement des syndicats face aux processus d’impression automatisés. Une analyse de la manière dont les hebdomadaires ont couvert la grève suggère que ces derniers ont relaté l’événement de manière à favoriser les éditeurs des journaux tout en déformant, voire en dénigrant, la position du syndicat sur la grève et sa façon de justifier celle-ci.
Idioma: Inglés

Artículos similares:

K.C. Irving Case por Beattie, Earle
The Ontario Press Council por Lunn, Richard
Can the CBC Be Spotless? por Rogers, Bruce
10