| Título: | Quantitative Phylogenetic Analysis in the 21st Century |
| Autores: |
Brooks,Daniel R Bilewitch,Jaret Condy,Charmaine Evans,David C Folinsbee,Kaila E Fröbisch,Jörg Halas,Dominik Hill,Stephanie McLennan,Deborah A Mattern,Michelle Tsuji,Linda A Ward,Jessica L Wahlberg,Niklas Zamparo,David Zanatta,David |
| Fecha: | 2007-12-01 |
| Publicador: | SCIELO |
| Fuente: |
 |
| Tipo: | journal article |
| Tema: |
phylogenetics quantitative phylogenetics maximum likelihood parsimony Bayesian likelihood Hennig information theory data congruence |
| Descripción: | We review Hennigian phylogenetics and compare it with Maximum parsimony, Maximum likelihood, and Bayesian likelihood approaches. All methods use the principle of parsimony in some form. Hennigian-based approaches are justified ontologically by the Darwinian concepts of phylogenetic conservatism and cohesion of homologies, embodied in Hennig's Auxiliary Principle, and applied by outgroup comparisons. Parsimony is used as an epistemological tool, applied a posteriori to choose the most robust hypothesis when there are conflicting data. Quantitative methods use parsimony as an ontological criterion: Maximum parsimony analysis uses unweighted parsimony, Maximum likelihood weight all characters equally that explain the data, and Bayesian likelihood relying on weighting each character partition that explains the data. Different results most often stem from insufficient data, in which case each quantitative method treats ambiguities differently. All quantitative methods produce networks. The networks can be converted into trees by rooting them. If the rooting is done in accordance with Hennig's Auxiliary Principle, using outgroup comparisons, the resulting tree can then be interpreted as a phylogenetic hypothesis. As the size of the data set increases, likelihood methods select models that allow an increasingly greater number of a priori possibilities, converging on the Hennigian perspective that nothing is prohibited a priori. Thus, all methods produce similar results, regardless of data type, especially when their networks are rooted using outgroups. Appeals to Popperian philosophy cannot justify any kind of phylogenetic analysis, because they argue from effect to cause rather than from cause to effect. Nor can particular methods be justified on the basis of statistical consistency, because all may be consistent or inconsistent depending on the data. If analyses using different types of data and/or different methods of phylogeny reconstruction do not produce the same results, more data are needed. |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
1 | 6 Fracturas maxilofaciales y factores asociados en derechohabientes del IMSS Campeche, México: Análisis retrospectivo 1994-1999 por Medina-Solis,Cario Eduardo,Córdova-González,José Luis,Casanova-Rosado,Alejandro José,Zazueta-Hernández,Maria Alejandra |
2 | 7 Factores de riesgo de mortalidad en el hijo de madre toxémica por Gómez-Gómez,Manuel,Danglot-Banck,Cecilia,García-de la Torre,Guadalupe Silvia,Antonio-Ocampo,Abdiel,Fajardo-Gutiérrez,Arturo,Sánchez-García,Maria Luisa,Ahumada-Ramírez,Elias |
3 Cerámicas mexicanas para cicatrización de piel por Piña-Barba,María Cristina,Tejeda-Cruz,Adriana,Regalado-Hernández,Miguel Ángel,Arenas-Reyes,María Isabel,Martín-Mandujano,Salvador,Montalvo,César | 8 I. De la enseñanza tutoral al aprendizaje a distancia por Cravioto,Alejandro |
4 Seguimiento de egresados de un diplomado en enseñanza de la Medicina por Ponce de León-Castañeda,Ma. Eugenia,Ruíz-Alcocer,Ma. del Carmen,Lozano-Sánchez,J. Rogelio | 9 II. La vocación científica: compromisos con el cambio permanente y la educación continua por Kretschmer,Roberto |
5 Primer estudio de teledermatología en México: Una nueva herramienta de salud pública por Lepe,Verónica,Moneada,Benjamín,Castanedo-Cázares,Juan Pablo,Martínez-Rodríguez,Alejandra,Mercado-Ceja,Sergio M,Gordillo-Moscoso,Antonio | 10 |